What a strange perspective. Citing a bad false paper in Cell is okay but citing a solid true preprint is not?https://twitter.com/mdshawkey/status/863348386879164416 …
So you're only against anonymous and closed peer review. I see.
-
-
I'm mixed on peer review (& am having a hard think about my role in the pub process) I think anon peer review is necessary in some contexts.
-
I'm still not entirely sure why people think preprints are a replacement for peer review? Peer review imho is required.
-
I think most preprint advocates just want preprints first, followed by peer review.
-
That's good, I got worried.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.