I don't disagree, but I'm saying it's obviously not universally applicable.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @DaniRabaiotti
Yes, and after all this is just a view of 58 participants on Twitter - not very representative... Still, gives you some ideas
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Abebab @DaniRabaiotti
Self reported preferred length might be wrong and not what people actually want though. So bear in mind it might not even be a guideline.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
A lot of popular blogs have very long posts.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I wonder if there's any literature out there on blog length vs reading time? I sometimes read long blogs. But often start then don't finish
5 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @Abebab @DaniRabaiotti
I'm certainly no expert, but given that what people self report as their favourite film vs which film they watch most often diverges...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I would be cautious in saying that self report means anything wrt most visited /read blogs.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Things like this are never so simple and if everybody reads / internalises only say 10% of a post you could why longer is better.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yup. And obviously number of visitors doesn't necessarily indicate how many people actually read it...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Tell me about it! Neither does num of comments. In the 1 I linked to some of the comments (I have 69!) show some very lapsed reading skills.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.