It has!!!!!! That's why I asked to read your paper :-)!!! Realized right after I said that that I was talking out of my ass.
-
-
Replying to @aeryn_thrace
Haha OK great. BTW just off the top of my head https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/38157770 …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest
Thanks! Will save it for my after-kid-is-in-bed reading time :-)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aeryn_thrace
You don't even need to read it, just that fact that we can do this is what I mean by "works".
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest
also, to clarify, what I had issue with specifically was fMRI as blobism. This is obviously different.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aeryn_thrace
Blobology is out of date and yes, univariate analyses are problematic but not wrong — medical use surely makes use of blobology finding.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @aeryn_thrace
I assume you don't think all univariate analyses are wrong?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
instead of giving both scientists and the scientific process the care and patience they require to produce trustworthy knowledge
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aeryn_thrace
I think it's easy to conflate the sensationalised findings with the actual research on the ground. I personally don't think they relate.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
I'm not sure I understand your reasoning, but I really, really have to finish coding this experiment, or my collaborators will kill me!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
OK, good luck! I tried to offer an explanation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.