Thanks! Will save it for my after-kid-is-in-bed reading time :-)
-
-
Replying to @aeryn_thrace
You don't even need to read it, just that fact that we can do this is what I mean by "works".
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest
also, to clarify, what I had issue with specifically was fMRI as blobism. This is obviously different.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aeryn_thrace
Blobology is out of date and yes, univariate analyses are problematic but not wrong — medical use surely makes use of blobology finding.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @aeryn_thrace
I assume you don't think all univariate analyses are wrong?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
no, not at all. My bigger issue is with lack of adequate training in how to correctly use & interpret them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aeryn_thrace
I think I still have to repeat what I said initially — the criticisms you levy can be equally and with more evidence be levied against many
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @aeryn_thrace
sister/related disciplines. We have evidence neuroimaging works because of the translational and applied uses and the lack of a replication
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @aeryn_thrace
crisis. So to tar neuro with a brush and single it out just seems totally baseless to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
haha OK didn't realise I was being fast 
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
only 140 character. Not good enough yet to stick all my thoughts in such limited space
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.