I want to think that I'm open to new evidence and a new assessment. My work isn't neuro so don't read it much. Only so many hours in the day
I think I still have to repeat what I said initially — the criticisms you levy can be equally and with more evidence be levied against many
-
-
you're responding to fast. that's what I just said.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
sister/related disciplines. We have evidence neuroimaging works because of the translational and applied uses and the lack of a replication
-
crisis. So to tar neuro with a brush and single it out just seems totally baseless to me.
-
mamacita!!! slow down!!!! I'm agreeing with you!!!
-
haha OK didn't realise I was being fast

-
only 140 character. Not good enough yet to stick all my thoughts in such limited space

-
Yeah, you need to do what I do just reply to your self.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
