not all p-hacking, but with enough room for interpretation to facilitate the process. Regardless, I'm curious about your work.
-
-
no, not at all. My bigger issue is with lack of adequate training in how to correctly use & interpret them.
-
I think I still have to repeat what I said initially — the criticisms you levy can be equally and with more evidence be levied against many
-
you're responding to fast. that's what I just said.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But that's a systemic problem in science: inadequate training guiding by the drive for sensationalistic findings >
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
instead of giving both scientists and the scientific process the care and patience they require to produce trustworthy knowledge
-
I think it's easy to conflate the sensationalised findings with the actual research on the ground. I personally don't think they relate.

-
I'm not sure I understand your reasoning, but I really, really have to finish coding this experiment, or my collaborators will kill me!
-
OK, good luck! I tried to offer an explanation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

