And obviously brains do not have infinite tape etc etc
-
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @maria_ndrnh and
I don't have angle: was trying to clarify/extract what you meant by computation. Interested in intuitions of someone that knows brains & CS.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kaznatcheev @maria_ndrnh and
You could have asked. I think computation is literally something the brain does. That is why I think it's pointless to argue if the brain is
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kaznatcheev and
a computer because I do not think such questions make sense. A computer is an abstract system that can compute. And a brain is a specific
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @kaznatcheev and
instance. Anything the brain does is a computation. I am into broad definitions.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @maria_ndrnh and
How broad is broad? Is anything a physical process does a computation (just many of them, like the pen on table, being boring computations)?
3 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kaznatcheev @o_guest and
Seriously, these terms have meanings: Information processing, computation, and cognition. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22210958
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @WiringTheBrain @kaznatcheev and
... meanings which need to be debated :P which is why cogsci has so many philosophers
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @maria_ndrnh @kaznatcheev and
I would say meanings that need to be specified when talking about them so you don't end up claiming a pen on a desk is computing
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
exactly though — I agree with you on this so much. Saying a pen is computing is pure trolling from Searle.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.