I did say anything the brain does — not anything a pen does. So broad but obviously limited.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @maria_ndrnh and
Now being pedantic: what if you cut my brain out and put it on table? :P Just trying to get you to be a bit more rigorous with definitions.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kaznatcheev @maria_ndrnh and
OMG that's actually in my trolling pile not in my helpful criticism pile
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kaznatcheev and
Also I'd argue the principle is charity is way more useful than trying to get me to say brain INSIDE a living human every time I say brain.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @maria_ndrnh and
I was trying to tune in to you ignoring _some_ processes that brains do, like it staying in skull (or on table) but not others & that vague.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kaznatcheev @maria_ndrnh and
I don't consider "staying in the skull" a process.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kaznatcheev and
A process is something you do, passively staying in a skull or on a table is just inertia.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kaznatcheev and
Anyway to what end is this? I said I would read your blog!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kaznatcheev and
The only way an object staying where it is a process is if you think we live in the Matrix.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @maria_ndrnh and
Principle of charity cuts both ways: replace "staying in skull" by neurons maintaining basic homeostasis shared with all cells/living things
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Sure it does, but tell me where did I talk down to you in this thread?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.