...that's just saying you're attracted to people to whom you can relate. well, yeah. so are most people.
-
-
Replying to @jaythenerdkid
I have high linguistic intelligence and enjoy discussions with people who share that trait. that's not an identity, that's human nature.
1 reply 6 retweets 78 likes -
Replying to @jaythenerdkid
5) even if sapiosexuals don't claim a sexuality, but another sex-based ID, even if they broadly define intelligence...again, what's left?
1 reply 5 retweets 43 likes -
Replying to @jaythenerdkid
if you remove misunderstanding of sexuality, fetishistic veneration of certain forms of intelligence, deeply-rooted ableism and racism...
1 reply 10 retweets 55 likes -
Replying to @jaythenerdkid
...what identity are sapiosexuals trying to claim, exactly? what is the basis of their identification?
1 reply 13 retweets 66 likes -
Replying to @jaythenerdkid
like, come on, my dudes (and it's almost always allo cishet dudes). you want to fuck conventionally attractive chicks who've seen cosmos.
7 replies 13 retweets 122 likes -
Replying to @jaythenerdkid
(and before any self-IDing sapiosexuals claim they don't care about looks, find me even ONE who's fat-posi and disability-inclusive.)
4 replies 8 retweets 90 likes -
Replying to @jaythenerdkid
tl;dr "conventionally attractive people with glasses who took a class on the socratic method once and like space" isn't a sexuality...
2 replies 30 retweets 129 likes -
Replying to @jaythenerdkid
...and claiming sapiosexuality is anything but fetishising a narrow definition of intelligence is ungrounded at best, disingenuous at worst.
1 reply 9 retweets 77 likes -
Replying to @jaythenerdkid
p.s. cosmos was average, most of your fav western philosophers are dull, shakespeare isn't a benchmark for literary genius, don't @ me
7 replies 17 retweets 144 likes
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

