"among the elite who want to own science (and pwn anyone who questions it), most ppl have no idea how science works" http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2017/04/the_march_for_science_was_eerily_religious.html …
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
I'm not sure what this article says. It's not a criticism of tactics, cause no alternatives are proposed, save maybe get house in order
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtraghavan @o_guest
What steps does one take to prevent cuts to the NIH in the US for example, and bring public attention to the fact it's not a good idea.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtraghavan @o_guest
I dislike that no alternatives were proposed. It just is a angry discussion about problems in science. Not incorrect, just besides the point
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtraghavan
It depends what you think the point is. I personally think it's very pertinent that left-wing sci-lovers are often anti-GMO.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
WRT the question about NIH, the steps are political not scientific sadly.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
And thus, we return to my prior point as politics is rhetoric and the rhetoric from the left/pro-sci folks is troubling/contradictory.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
I worry that left/pro-sci ppl are lost in a sea of contradictory virtue signalling while those who impose cuts present a unified front.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
But then again if you dislike rants... the Internet might not be the right place for you. 
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
[that is 100% tongue-in-cheek BTW and your input is valuable]
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.