Sure. But, there are often differences between what's proposed and what gets run.
-
-
Replying to @rogilmore
That doesn't make sense why you'd want to force them to prereg then.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
So, I'd prefer encouragement + incentives, probably top-off $ for researchers who go open.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rogilmore
Open science is so broad. I personally don't agree with everything within the movement.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @rogilmore
Would the list we propose at the end of this post be helpful in setting your personal priorities?https://im2punt0.wordpress.com/2017/03/27/defining-open-science-definitions/ …
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jeroenbosman @rogilmore
Useful but what I'm talking about is intersectionality within the open science movement. Do you touch on that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
I'm thinking of what I elaborated on herehttps://twitter.com/o_guest/status/855826733068627968 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I see where you say "No barriers based on race, gender, income, status" but please check out what I outline. Inclusion needs more work than
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
just saying "we are inclusive". I'm sure you're aware of course. But I'm saying actions + rhetoric > just numbers > words.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @rogilmore
2/2 Open Science will of course not solve that in it's slipstream and Open Science cannot be fully open without at least addressing it.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
So nice to read this! 
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @rogilmore
O and sorry for it's that should be its ;-)
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.