Couldn't NSF and NIH create an automatic system for #preregistering studies based on funded grant proposals?
Open science is so broad. I personally don't agree with everything within the movement.
-
-
Would the list we propose at the end of this post be helpful in setting your personal priorities?https://im2punt0.wordpress.com/2017/03/27/defining-open-science-definitions/ …
-
Useful but what I'm talking about is intersectionality within the open science movement. Do you touch on that?
-
I'm thinking of what I elaborated on herehttps://twitter.com/o_guest/status/855826733068627968 …
-
I see where you say "No barriers based on race, gender, income, status" but please check out what I outline. Inclusion needs more work than
-
just saying "we are inclusive". I'm sure you're aware of course. But I'm saying actions + rhetoric > just numbers > words.
-
2/2 Open Science will of course not solve that in it's slipstream and Open Science cannot be fully open without at least addressing it.
-
So nice to read this!

-
O and sorry for it's that should be its ;-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
