I don't understand what you mean by the last one. Can you elaborate?
-
-
I'm pretty sure open science is not more bigoted than tradition/close, but I've seen no reason to think it's less so either. I'd love to see
-
actual marginalised and underrepresented (usually) voices taking a more centre stage and sci minority issues highlighted more. For example,
-
women tend to not always feel comfortable about open peer review ideas proposed by open science generally because of known sexist biases.
-
INB4 somebody asks, you can start here, for example:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552397/ …
-
PS: Typos brought to you by my weekend migraines which seem to have made a little come-back this weekend.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.