With all the talk about why ECRs quit science, here's a list of things that have made me consider leaving:pic.twitter.com/4c7cMwAKre
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
No idea what the data says on that, but it's not just about raw data on numbers but also about rhetoric. Would be nice to set a precedent.
I'm pretty sure open science is not more bigoted than tradition/close, but I've seen no reason to think it's less so either. I'd love to see
actual marginalised and underrepresented (usually) voices taking a more centre stage and sci minority issues highlighted more. For example,
women tend to not always feel comfortable about open peer review ideas proposed by open science generally because of known sexist biases.
INB4 somebody asks, you can start here, for example:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552397/ …
PS: Typos brought to you by my weekend migraines which seem to have made a little come-back this weekend. 
well I for one don't give a fig about your gender, race, sexual orientation or religion. If you are anti p-hacking you are ok with me
That's really great — but sometimes it's exactly about caring so that adequate measures can be taken to accommodate underrepresented people.
Just attended the #sageassembly which overall was very aware of these issues in open science.
Excellent. I wish it had the associated rhetoric visibly on social media too.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.