Github only really supports the subset of scientists with good programming skills. It's optimised for programming, not for science
-
-
there are many non-programmer communities using github effectively - it just happens that the tools are highly adaptable
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest and
I'm confident that a tiny tiny fraction of scientists have uploaded any work to github. I expect most of my colleagues don't have an account
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
both of those statements are true, but don't affect whether Github is a good tool for scientists.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest and
Don’t get me wrong; I love github! But to a less-technical user it could be bewildering. "Sciencehub" would be simpler and use diff language
3 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @psychopy @blahah404 and
I think a super core prob regardless is that some technical skills are unavoidably needed to use any *hub like system.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
agreed - all the non-coder communities I know of using github do so because of training offered by libraries or
@MozillaScience3 replies 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @blahah404 @MozillaScience and
But consider that
#git is the core concept behind, GitHub is "only" a very good (proprietary) interface1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @alesarrett @blahah404 and
Not exactly. PRs are github 's idea as are all the social coding things.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Pull request.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.