They don't have to be exclusive, you can be wrong and feel bullied at the same time
-
-
Criticising researchers in public - no matter now big the audience - must be possible. It's essential for scientific progress.
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel @EveForster and
It can feel really, really shitty, but that doesn't mean it's bullying.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
There's scholarly criticism and then there's what she reported (accusations of corruption, social media harassment, death threats, etc)
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @EveForster @annemscheel and
You can criticize someone's methods in a way that still affords them respect
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
That's true and I always prefer this kind of respectful, research-centered critique. But if a researcher keeps trumpeting claims that have >
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel @EveForster and
> been shown to rest on unsound methods and do not hold up, does so on a very large stage, making substantial amounts of money with it and >
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel @EveForster and
> thus accepts causing harm (ppl wasting time/money on research & programmes on nonexistent effects), I can understand if ppl lose patience.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Yeah, I think it depends on a researchers level of social power; Cuddy's is higher than most
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Most of the academics who complain about being bullied, as Cuddy has, have high social power. It is the establishment trying to fight back.
2 replies 4 retweets 24 likes
Many people are bullied. Only the powerful have a platform to mention it to others pretty much.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.