It seems I'm writing an OpEd piece about the March for Science (maybe). Any points that I definitely need to stress?
-
-
E.g. would you say space exploration, which relies on rocket science (developed mainly for military use), is political per se?
-
Yeah. I think the pragmatics we use science is different. I think you must believe in a platonic oral science, which I don't think exists.
-
I just like to blame actual human beings rather than abstract concepts. But i see your point.
-
Oral = ideal. My phone decided I wanted to say oral.

-
I'm glad we can see what we mean despite my phone and twitter limitations!

-
Are you going to computational psych btw?

-
Of course! I am going to give a talk on "The Discreet Charm of the Connectionist approach". All welcome! :)
-
Bought my ticket months ago. Excited to see you talk!

- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
IMHO it was used for political purposes,by biased scientists. Still,difference between (legit) theories/data and their users is not trivial.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.