Just me or is this stringe? Why is preprint discussed before peer-review? [Pop]sci media really thinks this is OK? http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/study-finds-significant-differences-brains-men-and-women …
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
is peer review a good filter for what's newsworthy? looking at the literature s remarkable amount of crap passes peer review...
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest
so I feel like a preprint is as valid a source for news as something peer reviewed
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @blahah404
In this specific case I see no critical thinking at all though.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
i agree that this looks like crap science and crap journalism
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @o_guest
Glamour jrnls, publicity seeking, 'impact', funding the rockstars, haemorrhaging public money to corps... so much bullshit I can't breathe
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @blahah404
Don't look too long you will get a nose bleed. 
5:08 PM - 11 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
