Just me or is this stringe? Why is preprint discussed before peer-review? [Pop]sci media really thinks this is OK? http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/study-finds-significant-differences-brains-men-and-women …
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
is peer review a good filter for what's newsworthy? looking at the literature s remarkable amount of crap passes peer review...
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest
so I feel like a preprint is as valid a source for news as something peer reviewed
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @blahah404
In this specific case I see no critical thinking at all though.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
Are you against peer review in principle or just the current state of it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
not against peers reviewing each others work, but against it being a precondition for sharing, being secret, and being revered as truth
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Gavin Buckingham
See this subthreadhttps://twitter.com/DrGBuckingham/status/851773106918174720 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.