Just me or is this stringe? Why is preprint discussed before peer-review? [Pop]sci media really thinks this is OK? http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/study-finds-significant-differences-brains-men-and-women …
Fair enough. I do worry about pre-prints in the media though more than post-prints because the consumers of media are the public and maybe
-
-
I'm wrong but post-prints seem to be treated to criticism by other scientists in the media so let's hope that is applied to pre-prints too.
-
The specific case I tweeted about in the OP does not seem to have anything critical within the article.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.