Just me or is this stringe? Why is preprint discussed before peer-review? [Pop]sci media really thinks this is OK? http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/study-finds-significant-differences-brains-men-and-women …
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
I'm gonna be contrarian here and say there's nothing wrong or bad about discussing a preprint with a journalist
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @psforscher @o_guest
A preprint represents your provisional best guess about a subject -- just like a conventional publication
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @psforscher
you think it's equivalent to a post-review paper?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
Pretty much, except a few people have commented on it. I don't have much faith that the peer review process adds much to publications
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @psforscher
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted
If I may, this thread might be useful: https://twitter.com/kopshtik/status/851773894117556224 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
This Tweet is unavailable.
7:19 AM - 11 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.