Just me or is this stringe? Why is preprint discussed before peer-review? [Pop]sci media really thinks this is OK? http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/study-finds-significant-differences-brains-men-and-women …
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
I'm gonna be contrarian here and say there's nothing wrong or bad about discussing a preprint with a journalist
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @psforscher @o_guest
A preprint represents your provisional best guess about a subject -- just like a conventional publication
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @psforscher @o_guest
As long as you discuss your degree of uncertainty with the journalist, seems fine to me
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @psforscher @o_guest
But then again you should be doing that with your regular publications too
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @psforscher
Generally speaking I think it's fine when including the caveats you mention but this specific case highlights how [badly??] it can go...
7:18 AM - 11 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.