I'm going to say no, not if you go with the classical behaviourist approachhttps://twitter.com/o_guest/status/851355926414143488 …
If you want to play with the pragmatics that's fine, but it's not how we use the word in psych usually. CC @GraziosiSergio
-
-
I'm also w you. One of the characters of Behaviourism, as far as I'm aware, is it's insistence on behaviour that is measurable &quantifiable
-
I think the "inconsistence" bit is key. Having a thought scanner, would thinking become behaviour?
-
Well, goes back to how you define those terms, to begin with
-
Which is what I said at the start

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

