I'm going to say no, not if you go with the classical behaviourist approachhttps://twitter.com/o_guest/status/851355926414143488 …
-
-
I would say it's the very definition of not behaving at all
-
Indeed! The things that behaviourists are heavily criticized for, for failing to explain/consider
-
It is observable and quantifiable though...so maybe behaviourists would take it?
-
You mean *it isn't observable and quantifiable*?
-
I was thinking of default mode network in an MRI
-
It isn't. Just like eg semantic memory. We can localise on fMRI but it's not a behaviour. The task that probes sem memory is the behaviour.
-
Clearly this joke comment fell flat. I'm out
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
