-
-
This perfectly captures my sentiment when I was revising our JPSP-manuscript...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Be sure to include reviewer 2's papers in your reference list, too!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I had thought this was just a urban myth but then r4 gave away their identity by suggesting we cite an unrelated obscure article
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @dingding_peng @chbergma and
"After citing all large seminal papers, what about this uncited unrelated paper from the Scandinavian Journal of Management?"
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
-
Replying to @EikoFried @dingding_peng and
Happens so much. You can remove them after acceptance of they are 100% irrelevant.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @EikoFried and
We actually just told them that the suggested paper was neither on topic nor informative considering its small sample size.
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @dingding_peng @o_guest and
I call this "German style" rebuttal letter
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @dingding_peng @EikoFried and
Published review? I have published ones and people have commented on them interpersonally.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
You can't believe the things people read and how perceptive they are. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.