Have preregistration supporters thought of such issues—any good blogs? It's seemed anti-Bayesian to me for a while. http://www.bayesianphilosophy.com/a-modest-proposal-to-fix-science/ …
-
-
Fair enough. How about, without PR, Reported BF = Max BF from an unknown number of tests, all done with 50:50 priors.
-
I'm not sure that's how it works.
-
I'm willing to accept I could be wrong here. But let us not argue maths on twitter.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or, if you want to run 100 tests and only report the best, and you're telling us your prior was 50:50 for each, you're a liar or an idiot.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.