countering her arguments but doesn't discuss it. Not helpful.
-
-
Replying to @annemscheel @dingding_peng and
I can't agree on this as I have not read the book. So negative
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @dingding_peng and
But you seemed to support the book here despite not having read it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel @dingding_peng and
I support the book and I explained why.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @dingding_peng and
But the reasons you support it seem unfalsifiable: I agree w/ you >
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @annemscheel @o_guest and
that books that reduce sexism are a good thing, but I think this >
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @annemscheel @o_guest and
book seems to misrepresent science & that does a disservice to its>
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @annemscheel @o_guest and
anti-sexist agenda. I presented evidence. You say you can't judge >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel @o_guest and
the evidence b/c you haven't read the book but your endorsement >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel @o_guest and
for it is unaffected by that. I don't understand.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
No, I'm exactly judging evidence despite not having read book.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.