> doesn't seem to represent the sci v/ well though bases its argument on it.
-
-
But the reasons you support it seem unfalsifiable: I agree w/ you >
-
that books that reduce sexism are a good thing, but I think this >
-
book seems to misrepresent science & that does a disservice to its>
-
emphasis on "seems to" neither of us know hence I can't agree.
-
it's always the case when a woman speaks out against sexism
-
that higher standards are applied to what she says, so why
-
don't we wait and see how the people she is criticising respond
-
and/or perhaps we should read it.

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.