county, because I recommended it.
I've met enough evo psychs & bios, they do think this in their research.
-
-
Hang on, my point is not that people aren't sexist. My point is the book >
-
> doesn't seem to represent the sci v/ well though bases its argument on it.
-
I haven't done a review of what evo psychs believe but others have and
-
it's pretty sexist. And yes, what they believe in their research.
-
@pzmyers reviews evo psychs' beliefs & claims: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/category/bad_science/evolutionary-psychology/ … -
Whether or not evo psychs are sexist is irrelevant for the point >
-
I'm trying to make: Fine criticises weak studies&then acknowledges>pic.twitter.com/tKDvRZSt6U
-
better ones in footnotes only. So apparently even she sees the sci>
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.