> field's standards. We need both. I was speaking about Wansink because the debate started with him. We can't take >
-
-
> individuals out of the equation but expect individuals to respond. That's my point. Really need to sleep now.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
it's getting worrying to me that "repent & be saved" is some people's mantra with questionable research
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Who is saying that? I haven't seen that in these discussions
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
no, I mean in general. It seems coming out as having done questionable stuff gets a pat on the back in
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
I think people should be commended for admitting such, it's not easy and it's not costless
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
it just often feels like a soap in the face to us who call it out daily. I quit my prev job at Oxford
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
in part because of questionable stuff. I don't get a cookie right? Not that I want one. But it's clear
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
what! of course you get a cookie! keep up the good work.pic.twitter.com/WBN1Y3HZ8q
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes

cookies all round!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.