I am totally on board with field-wide interventions. It's not EITHER hold individuals accountable OR increase >
-
-
> field's standards. We need both. I was speaking about Wansink because the debate started with him. We can't take >
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
> individuals out of the equation but expect individuals to respond. That's my point. Really need to sleep now.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
it's getting worrying to me that "repent & be saved" is some people's mantra with questionable research
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Who is saying that? I haven't seen that in these discussions
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
no, I mean in general. It seems coming out as having done questionable stuff gets a pat on the back in
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
context matters. no? i'd give ed awh credit, he had to withdraw 10 papers because of co-author issues.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm a little skeptical about the type and manner of credit, but sure.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Of course, not as hard as raising kids. :)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
thankfully no such plans — child rearing is tough!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.