Good question, tough question. I don't know. But I think we should discuss that as a community.
-
-
Replying to @annemscheel @bradpwyble
If you cant predict at least orderings ahead of time, then dont run the expt or the study.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JeffRouder @bradpwyble
I am totally on board with field-wide interventions. It's not EITHER hold individuals accountable OR increase >
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
> field's standards. We need both. I was speaking about Wansink because the debate started with him. We can't take >
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
> individuals out of the equation but expect individuals to respond. That's my point. Really need to sleep now.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
it's getting worrying to me that "repent & be saved" is some people's mantra with questionable research
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Who is saying that? I haven't seen that in these discussions
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
no, I mean in general. It seems coming out as having done questionable stuff gets a pat on the back in
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
in fact I was having a discussion about this with quite a few fellow scis who felt this was also the
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
case recently. We're a bit disheartened.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.