in all other areas. Consequences are crucial to keep our moral&judicial integrity and build a new sense of responsibility. /end
-
-
Replying to @annemscheel
agreed, consequences crucial, but contrition should be acknowledged favorably unless proven false.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bradpwyble
Absolutely no problem with that. But remorse doesn't let you get around the minimum sentence.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @bradpwyble
Good question, tough question. I don't know. But I think we should discuss that as a community.
6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel @bradpwyble
If you cant predict at least orderings ahead of time, then dont run the expt or the study.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JeffRouder @bradpwyble
I am totally on board with field-wide interventions. It's not EITHER hold individuals accountable OR increase >
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
> field's standards. We need both. I was speaking about Wansink because the debate started with him. We can't take >
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
> individuals out of the equation but expect individuals to respond. That's my point. Really need to sleep now.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
it's getting worrying to me that "repent & be saved" is some people's mantra with questionable research
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
very religious. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.