that's not exactly the kind of work flow I criticise when I do. But is it worrisome for you that Matlab is dying?
so you think Matlab had staying power because it's got current monopoly?
-
-
also advantages because of company overseeing development (vs groups of volunteers), differences in how language operates
-
when you say overseeing development I hear "hides bugs". I guess we disagree on the future so only time will tell.

-
I see more consistency in naming conventions and how arguments passed to functions...much function code is readable (and commented)
-
how can you read them if they are closed source? https://uk.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/79714-how-do-we-know-that-matlabs-algorithms-are-working-properly?requestedDomain=www.mathworks.com …
-
...you just type 'edit [function]'. It doesn't work for some of the base math functions, but does work for most other functions
-
also can open those files in any txt editor
-
prob cause basic maths is in c++ or something? But yeah, so if you can see them why do they call it closed source?
-
yeah, base math is compiled c code, 'edit' will still show you the help text, but not code. But say 'edit ttest' and...code appearspic.twitter.com/AdfLxxKNgk
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
