in effect the authors ringfenced the area for themselves and their students/collaborators.
-
-
Replying to @dimpase @AlfiePates
that sounds pretty disturbing. Was it on purpose?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @AlfiePates
ostensibly to ensure the output, unique id's for certain objects, stay the same
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dimpase @AlfiePates
what do you mean by unique id for certain projects?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @AlfiePates
certain *objects* (groups of small order)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @o_guest @AlfiePates
mathematical objects. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_group …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dimpase @AlfiePates
not sure I get what they were doing couldn't they just define rules for the objects to have certain IDs?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and not do it via a licence? Or I guess this was just an excuse... to have a restriction on the code regardless?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @AlfiePates
it is a highly irregular thing, akin to, say, organic molecules. providing a set of rules to produce unique id is hard
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't know anything about either so I'll take your word for it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.