poll time! I vote for @biorxiv_neursci
-
-
-
I would actually go for that too or maybe
@PsyArXiv — is there a sub category on there that's nn models..? -
neither has tons of NN work as far I know
-
& this is even tougher as it's
#replication of stuff failed and successful as well as new stuff -
why is
#replication stuff so hard to publish!?! even w/ all the mainstream lip service, still mystifyingly difficult. don't get it. -
I'll try my best but as you say: hard.
-
you'll slay, in the end
but yes, hard. - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I just put a model up on
@PsyArXiv, though that also has empirical data. is yours just the model? -
oh, that's great! No empirical data, all models, about 3 replications some less replicated than others.
-
as far as I know the only difference may be the intended audience. Psy felt like a better fit for me.
-
I think my audience would be primarily, fellow modellers but also hopefully more broadly cog neuro ppl. What were you thinking?
-
I was thinking the non-modelers in my topic area. cog & dev psychologists. Not sure what's the best place for all models all day :)
-
haha nobody knows! Also not just models but replicated with intricate repercussions... nightmare!!

-
where are you going to submit it for review?
-
I think we might as well try, psych rev (soon hopefully)!
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

