this already exists eg my lab has way more postdocs than PhDs
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @JohnKounios
in the US, at least, hiring career programmers at market rates is really hard with standard funding mechanisms
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
it's helpful to have extra-academic orgs like Allen, Simons, Janelia who can hire these ppl. Cool w/me if FB plays too
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
everything they do is blustery, but their money is still green, and a welcome infusion.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @neurobongo @JohnKounios
oh certainly — I just didn't like the titular rhetoric
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest
Yeah, me neither, but I think I've just learned to tune it out over the years. Prob would've pissed off earlier-career-me too
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @neurobongo
not sure I'm pissed off as implies angry, I'm just like not down with it. But I see what you mean. Mellower with experience.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @neurobongo
speed and similar pressures on science do cause serious problem, eg, replication crises tho... So I'm weary and wary.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @neurobongo
engineering is great but it's not how we do science. In eng a bridge built quickly is still a bridge, as otherwise its rubble.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @neurobongo
you can't call rubble a bridge. In sci it's diff as bad sci can still get published. You can't spot easily it's broken.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
the is why we need to go at the appropriate speed and not optimise for speed. If we do, we end not having meaningful science.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.