Prove to me this isn't another dud — European brain project, etc.
‘I want science to happen faster’ https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/mar/05/chan-zuckerberg-initiative-scientist-jeremy-freeman …
engineering is great but it's not how we do science. In eng a bridge built quickly is still a bridge, as otherwise its rubble.
-
-
you can't call rubble a bridge. In sci it's diff as bad sci can still get published. You can't spot easily it's broken.
-
the is why we need to go at the appropriate speed and not optimise for speed. If we do, we end not having meaningful science.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
