@o_guest oh by the way, i almost used the word "neuroplausible" in a manuscript draft the other day... lol
-
-
Replying to @elneurozorro @o_guest
it meant to set up the point that so many things are "plausible" ad hoc, but then i was like... nah i can't use that in a paper
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @elneurozorro
haha, I'm calling out those who use it badly as it's been used a lot in papers
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @elneurozorro
"neural networks are great models because they are neurally plausible" etc etc
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @elneurozorro
they aren't plausible on the neuroscientific level, that's why it's evil
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @elneurozorro
It's funny because that's what even (some) neurosciency people think...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest @elneurozorro
That they are plausible, it's in their name after all ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @chbergma @elneurozorro
yeah it's meaningless
12:19 AM - 4 Mar 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.