@o_guest oh by the way, i almost used the word "neuroplausible" in a manuscript draft the other day... lol
-
-
Replying to @elneurozorro @o_guest
it meant to set up the point that so many things are "plausible" ad hoc, but then i was like... nah i can't use that in a paper
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @elneurozorro
haha, I'm calling out those who use it badly as it's been used a lot in papers
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @elneurozorro
"neural networks are great models because they are neurally plausible" etc etc
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @elneurozorro
they aren't plausible on the neuroscientific level, that's why it's evil
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @elneurozorro
It's funny because that's what even (some) neurosciency people think...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
i mean theres also an additional level that so much stuff is "plausible" but what does that even mean? so underspecified
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @elneurozorro @o_guest
That's an additional problem, next to the 50 flavors of plausible I can come up with just now...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
hence why I said http://neuroplausible.com/about
-
-
sounds pretttty cool tho
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.