"About that Hart (2013) retraction..." New blog post about peer review, noisy methods, and scientific culture.https://medium.com/@richarddmorey/about-that-hart-2013-retraction-79cfdaea5cb0#.qwzasjmo5 …
-
-
Replying to @richarddmorey @Medium
great post. I really feel the worst part about it is blaming a grad student instead of growing some gonads.pic.twitter.com/i9UacGAVrg
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @dingding_peng @richarddmorey
What if it turned out that fraud was widespread and almost nobody in universities or journals actually cared?
5 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
-
Replying to @maltoesermalte @sTeamTraen and
is peer review broken or r we allowing charlatans/clueless ppl to perform it?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Key part of
@richarddmorey's post attached. Revs don't like to trash year's hard work by PhD cand.pic.twitter.com/D09JFyMswI
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @sTeamTraen @maltoesermalte and
I read the whole post, and I know about this rule already... the rule is bad!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
'
@sTeamTraen@maltoesermalte@dingding_peng@richarddmorey + just to be 100% clear I'd never do study without a theory! Ever. So no problem.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
'@sTeamTraen @maltoesermalte @dingding_peng @richarddmorey my thoughts on the gen prob since no space in one tweet http://dx.doi.org/10.15200/winn.146590.01538 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.