Haven't done more than a couple hundred lines of JS. But I'm not a developer so I'm biased in many ways.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @mundoplano
I don't strongly recommend it. I much prefer python. But the relative language complexity is rather large
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest @mundoplano
yeah. JS has some some weird semantics, but a relatively small core of them. Python just has a lot of different rules
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DRMacIver @mundoplano
It certainly does. Not a big problem imho.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @mundoplano
it depends on what you're trying to do. It's a big problem in that it's a large part of the 2/3 and pypy/cpython splits
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DRMacIver @mundoplano
True. Although I've already forgotten what the latter split is even about.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @mundoplano
pypy makes your code faster nearly for free, but only if said code runs correctly on it. Most does, but a lot doesn't.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DRMacIver @mundoplano
Ah right yeah hehe why I never use it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @mundoplano
yeah right now it's only just starting to become viable for scientific stuff - numpy support has lagged a lot
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I need way more than numpy myself to get my work done. But then again I'm easily the least tied to python/single language modeller I know.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @mundoplano
yeah, didn't intend to suggest numpy was sufficient, just necessary
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DRMacIver @mundoplano
I'm very lucky with hardware, but a faster numpy would be
for lots of more junior scientists.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.