(or it might be better studied than I think and I just don't read the right literature)
-
-
Replying to @DRMacIver
I guess it might boil down to if it can be experimentally qualified and quantified – I don't if has been by anybody...?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
there are the classic mental rotation tasks but I've never been clear on how predictive they really are
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DRMacIver
Yes, of course there are. But they are not and there are not AFAIK clinical tests for aphantasia.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @DRMacIver
some lit rev here if you haven't see it already by
@neurocritic http://neurocritic.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/imagine-these-experiments-in-aphantasia.html …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
so one way to sci investigate would be to get aphantasics and non-ap ppl into an fMRI and decode them imagining or
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
trying to imagine and compare the voxels w/ them actually looking at the thing. Would be way of comparing subjective
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
experience VS voxel activations. Esp since we know imagining in non-ap ppl involves visual cortex a lot.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @neurocritic
what sort of thing do you have in mind as an imagining task?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DRMacIver @neurocritic
the 2 conds would be "imagine an X" vs "look at this X"; X = basiclevel categs (cat, dog, ect) as we already do.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
this is simple stuff already done, my spin is one group will be aphantasics and non-aphs.
-
-
*one group ap, one non-ap
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.