Haha, on a serious note: I don't study prosopagnosia altho 2 ppl I know fairly well do & I know nobody who studies aphantasia.
the 2 conds would be "imagine an X" vs "look at this X"; X = basiclevel categs (cat, dog, ect) as we already do.
-
-
this is simple stuff already done, my spin is one group will be aphantasics and non-aphs.
-
*one group ap, one non-ap
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
yes this is why I asked. "imagine an X" is not really an instruction I know how to follow.
-
OK, well if I ever do, which I won't haha, I will ask you to pilot stuff in the info sheet and instructions.

-
It would be interesting to see if the 2 groups show similar activations in the 2 conds both between & within group.
-
It would shed light on what can be fMRI decoded and what can't WRT subjective experience as reported by aphantasics.
-
And that brings it closer to what I research finally.

-
Not that much closer mind. I do not deal with subjective experience sounds way too qual.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.