1. The creation of artificial intelligence with human-style cognition is inherently immoral.
-
-
Replying to @1aprildaniels
2. The path to success is littered with failures. But failures in this sense would be thinking, sentient entities. Not human, but close.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @1aprildaniels
3. We would be creating people--or entities as close as to make no difference--with the explicit intention of abandoning/killing them.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @1aprildaniels
4. Because you do not keep prototypes around. You do not continue to support and protect them once their purpose is finished.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @1aprildaniels
5. Imagine if the only way for you to be born would be for your developmentally disabled older siblings to be birthed and murdered.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @1aprildaniels
isn't that how the process of evolution produced us? The path to creating homo sapiens has left other species as casualties.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
Yes but there was nobody in a lab deliberately engineering the millions of deaths it took to create us. That matters.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @1aprildaniels
True, absolutely. But what you said is not that far off. We don't have imagine it as in your point 5. It literally happened.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm curious. Do you think of my work as mass murder?
-
-
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.