Huh. Ta.
-
-
Replying to @j_w_baker
so in many ways, that word is pretty useful for us
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
Well in that case so long as you all tell everyone else what it means when you use it, I'm happy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @j_w_baker @o_guest
The real problem is people who don't know the definition fo the word using it (I would argue defiantly) incorrectly
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I guess also important to differentiate between use in comp sci and use in psychology
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I have degrees in both aforementioned related fields & work in cogsci. I guess I've forgotten compsci def.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
so in comp sci I'd understand it to mean methods that somehow "guess" or approximate an answer
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
that's pretty much identical to cogsci then...?
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm not clear that the way Kasparov played chess would be called heuristic? But maybe it would
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
great his cognitive processes could / would be described thus indeed
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
great = yeah (autocorrect) 

Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.