I'm thinking about organizing a conference workshop about pre-registration and open science. Please share: tips, experiences, resources!
-
-
Replying to @Research_Tim
will it give a Bayesian view of preregistration? Is such a view even possible? Just curious.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
No, just in and by itself. There's nothing Bayesian about it. In fact, pre-reg is more important for freq stats than Bayes!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Research_Tim
indeed. So more broadly would you see it as anti Bayesian or just not Bayesian?
#askingforafriend2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
Freq and Bayes are both fully compatible with pre-reg. Any research line needs it, no matter the stats paradigm.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Research_Tim
you'll discover dissenting views on this if you're interested.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @Research_Tim
I have seen variants that appear to be, but perhaps it's become less so.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
I have heard of many (often weak) arguments against pre-reg, but never that it is anti Bayes. I have no idea why it would be so
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
