I.e. It's about acceptance of traits in others than in yourself, which isn't a split I'd have expected in CBT
-
-
Replying to @DRMacIver
I can only speak from my own therapy. And yes, it was very much about what this text contains.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
fair enough. I'd like to talk more about this with you at some point but suspect twitter isn't the venue and I'm distracted ATM
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DRMacIver
sure & it's a sensitive and potentially private subject so understandable not to use twitter!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @DRMacIver
also to be clear & INB4: I do not 100% agree with the text and do not claim that CBT teaches you to want to give everybody a hug.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
I had mostly taken that as read, but thanks for clarifying
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DRMacIver
twitter though! you never know what trolls might show up to explain to me what I really meant!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @DRMacIver
I also don't claim that lessons that you opt-in to learning/using during CBT are by necessity good broader life philosophies.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @DRMacIver
also – Jesus! – that blog has some pretty objectionable views, in my opinion of course.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
worth reading is definitely not intended to mean always right! E.g. She tends a lot more libertarian than I do.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Oh, deffo. I'm no lib* so I obviously had some gag reflexes being hit by some of the theory and praxis proposed.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.