are you saying that because of the my pinned preprint or just generally?
-
-
Replying to @tom_hartley @aechase
I've taught & been taught NNs from all perspectives: code, maths, theory; only cringe if "bioplausible" is used a lot.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I've encountered many weird attitudes to the plausibility or otherwise. People seem oddly defensive...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tom_hartley @aechase
I only think they are plausible in way we describe here – altho I'd avoid due to connotations:http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/09/09/071076 …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I need to read the paper properly. It's a really key topic right now. I think we're making progress (at last).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tom_hartley @aechase
which one? the levels of analysis aspects?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
levels of analysis, functional smoothness - how to compare, measure, predict/explain with RSA type analyses or new designs
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tom_hartley @aechase
props on using functional smoothness – some people have hated the phrase when I have used it!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
hard to get people who disagree to say so clearly and make falsifiable predictions.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I think we will probably agree on a lot, but I'll obviously let you read it and not assume!
-
New conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.