ooh really? Where?
-
-
-
would assume (hope?) most scientists identify as falsificationists. Interesting empirical question though.
-
I bloody hope not, we're past Popperian falsification in my lab.
-
I'm not saying everybody has to be more Bayesian but like Kuhn exists, Lakatos exists, even Feyerabend...
-
I would argue Lakatos and Feyerabend were falsificationists. Just rightly critical of finer points.
-
definitely can't argue that Bayes is tho
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would gladly swap a Trump supporter for a logical positivist any day! ;-p
-
you realise that's Nazis both ways though
-
Sure the logical positivist were not strong on the ethic side, but they liked logic!
-
yes, indeed. Regardless they still killed people. More than Trump.
-
When I read that I am imagining Carnap abd the Vienna circle killing people and it does not quite work. :-/
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
they're like American libertarians, read one book never read anything after. In logical positivist case, prolly nagel
-
truth or nothing and just some scientism Sam Harris BS
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
